The Nice Liberal Missionary 11:09 am / 29 July 2010 by cherylcline, at der Blaustrumpf
In case Yglesias didn’t provide a sufficient dose of incoherence today, check out Bryan Caplan, who is apparently trying to bridge the gap between libertarians and conservatives. In doing so, he resembles a certain liberal with a conscience far, far more than he does any “conservative”:
A few liberals – and many libertarians – literally advocate open borders. I recognize that immigration is the greatest foreign aid program in human history, and I sympathize with the plight of would-be immigrants in the Third World. Most immigrants – legal or not – are nice people. But open borders is crazy. It seriously risks killing the goose that lays the golden eggs. I’m very open to more cost-effective and humane ways to deal with the negative effects of immigration. But as long as immigrants are eligible for government benefits, hurt low-skilled native workers, and vote, the only people we should readily admit are the highly-educated and clear-cut humanitarian cases. I’d put Haitians in the latter category. Asking Mexicans to live on a $10,000 a year in Mexico is reasonable, but asking Haitians to starve in post-earthquake Haiti is a disgrace.
The Conservative Missionary, Bryan Caplan | EconLog | Library of Economics and Liberty.
Caplan thinks there are only two groups of immigrants worthy of our attention: those who have attained advanced degrees, and those who can stimulate our sense of pity. In other words, he resembles no one more than your typical “meritocratic egalitarian” liberal with his twin obsessions: signaling his status among members of his own class and educational achievement, and demonstrating great solicitude for the most extraordinarily disadvantaged. Everyone in between–the middle class, those who may not have attended the Harvards of their respective home countries –is invisible and can pretty much go to hell. It’s only reasonable.
From a purely economic standpoint, this makes no goddamn sense. The American economy would clearly be boosted by admitting those who have attained a moderate level of affluence on their own; certainly they are better equipped to do so than the absolutely desperate and destitute. What conservative would argue that America should import those from the very top and the very bottom of the social strata?
I think this is how one fundamentally distinguishes liberals from conservatives. Conservatives at least aren’t perpetually surprised to learn that the middle class even exists. Liberals are only interested in the middle class so long as they are trying to propel members of the lower class into it; once they’ve attained such status, liberals can go back to ignoring, despising and disdaining them.
Filed under: Blogging, Immigration, Libertarianism Tagged: wtf





